Miftah Ismail criticizes the opposition to the privatisation efforts, particularly the plan to privatise PIA, by the caretaker government and Privatisation Minister Fawad Hasan Fawad. Ismail presents compelling figures, highlighting PIA’s continuous losses, reaching Rs88 billion last year, with accumulated losses over the years amounting to Rs717 billion. He argues that privatisation would be financially prudent for Pakistan, emphasizing that the accumulated losses could have been utilized for significant public welfare projects. The author extends the argument to Pakistan Railways, receiving substantial government subsidies, and suggests that privatising both tracks and trains while defining the ministry’s role as a regulator could enhance efficiency. Ismail also addresses the issue of katchi abadis on railway lands, proposing regularization and ownership for occupants. He further suggests handing over Pakistan Steel Mills’ remaining land to National Bank and Sui Southern to recover dues and reviving the steel mill through selling or leasing. The writer contends that privatising these entities, rather than injecting new government funds, would be a more effective strategy, emphasizing the need for private-sector investment and well-regulated markets to make state-owned enterprises profitable.
The article critiques opposition to privatisation, focusing on PIA’s staggering losses and proposing it as a financially sound decision. It extends the argument to Pakistan Railways, suggesting privatisation for efficiency, and addresses the issue of katchi abadis on railway lands. The writer recommends handing over Pakistan Steel Mills’ land to recover dues and reviving the steel mill through privatisation. Privatising these entities is deemed essential for stemming losses and improving the overall economy, emphasizing private-sector investment and well-regulated markets.
SOLUTIONS of The Problem:
1. Privatisation of PIA:
- Swiftly privatise PIA to curtail ongoing losses, ensuring job security for employees.
2. Restructuring Pakistan Railways:
- Redefine the role of the railway ministry as a regulator and privatise both tracks and trains to multiple operators.
- Set and enforce safety standards for tracks and trains while regulating maximum charges for freight and passengers.
3. Regularisation of Katchi Abadis:
- Regularise katchi abadis on railway lands, granting ownership to occupants, and sell the remaining land to support existing railway employees.
4. Privatisation of Pakistan Steel Mills:
- Hand over Pakistan Steel Mills’ remaining land to National Bank and Sui Southern to recover dues.
- Sell or lease the steel mill for revival, ensuring continued payment to existing employees until retirement.
5. Private-Sector Investment:
- Emphasize the need for private-sector investors in state-owned enterprises for sustainable profitability.
6. Well-Regulated Markets:
- Advocate for well-regulated markets to foster efficiency and benefit consumers and taxpayers.
IMPORTANT Facts and Figures Given in the Article:
- PIA Losses Last Year: Rs88 billion on sales of Rs172 billion.
- Accumulated PIA Losses: Rs717 billion with a present value of over Rs900 billion.
- PR Subsidy Last Year: Rs70 billion (operational losses and development expenditures).
- Accumulated PR Subsidies in 15 Years: Rs783 billion with a present value of around Rs1,000 billion.
- Accumulated Government Funding to PIA in 15 Years: Rs109 billion directly and guaranteed bank loans of Rs263 billion.
- Pakistan Steel Mills Shut Duration: Eight years.
- PSM Debt: Over Rs100 billion to National Bank and Sui Southern.
- PSM Remaining Land: About 8,000 acres.
MCQs from the Article:
- What is the main focus of the article regarding PIA? A. Increasing government funding B. Privatisation C. Employee layoffs D. Expanding routes
- What does the author suggest for Pakistan Railways to enhance efficiency? A. Increase government subsidies B. Privatise both tracks and trains C. Introduce luxury services D. Build new railway stations
- What is the proposed solution for katchi abadis on railway lands? A. Eviction B. Regularisation with ownership for occupants C. Increase rent charges D. Convert into commercial spaces
- How does the author propose recovering dues related to Pakistan Steel Mills? A. Selling the steel mill B. Handing over remaining land to National Bank and Sui Southern C. Leasing the steel mill D. Injecting more government funds
- What does the writer emphasize for the improvement of state-owned enterprises? A. Increased government intervention B. Private-sector investment C. Enhanced bureaucracy D. Unregulated markets
- Aspersions (noun) (الزامات): Attacks on the reputation or integrity of someone or something.
- Jeopardising (verb) (خطرہ ڈالنا): Putting something or someone into a situation where there is a danger of harm.
- Subsidised (adjective) (حکومتی سہولت سے مستفید): Receiving financial support from the government.
- Revived (adjective) (بحال): Brought back to life or activity.
- Regularised (adjective) (رسمی بنایا گیا): Made regular or consistent.
- Encroachment (noun) (دخل): Intrusion on a person’s territory, rights, etc.
- Stem (verb) (رکنا): Stop the progress or development of something unpleasant.
- Prudent (adjective) (اہتمامی): Acting with or showing care and thought for the future.
- Injecting (verb) (انٹر کرنا): Introducing (a new or different element) into something.
- Impetus (noun) (تحریک): The force that makes something happen or happen more quickly.
📢 Attention Readers! We are deeply concerned about individuals who share our summaries without providing proper credit. We kindly request that you refrain from removing the attribution label affixed to this article. Considerable time, effort, resources, and expertise have been invested in its creation. It is essential to exhibit professionalism by crediting the source appropriately and acknowledging the rightful contributions. Your cooperation in sharing the original article is greatly appreciated. Failure to comply with this request may lead to legal consequences. We maintain a dedicated team of advocates ready to address instances of unprofessional and unethical behaviour, including copyright infringement. 🔥 Get Concise Editorial Summaries, Solutions, and Vocabulary Meanings! 🔥 🔵 Prepared by the Expert Team at CSSMCQs .com! 🔵 👉 Looking for a hassle-free way to stay informed about current affairs and editorial insights? We’ve got you covered! 💡 ✨ Introducing “Dawn Important Editorials“! ✨ 📚 Join our WhatsApp Channel for quick and comprehensive summaries of the latest editorials, along with well-crafted solutions and helpful vocabulary meanings. 📚 🔍 Why Choose Us? 🔍 👉 Our team at CSSMCQs.com uses their efforts to bring you accurate and efficient summaries. 👉 Stay updated with the most important points from the editorials, saving you time and effort. 👉 Benefit from our expertly crafted solutions that offer insightful perspectives and creative ideas. 👉 Expand your vocabulary with our thorough explanations and translations. 👉 All this is at your fingertips, available in one convenient WhatsApp group! 🌟 Why Reading Summaries are so necessary for CSS & PMS Aspirants? 📝 Cultivating Critical Analysis: Summaries of editorials and opinions distill the essence of complex arguments, enhancing your ability to dissect intricate ideas, extract core arguments, and recognize underlying themes. 📝 Efficient Time Management: CSS aspirants often juggle multiple subjects and topics. Reading summarized editorials and opinions allows you to grasp diverse viewpoints in a fraction of the time. 📝 Diverse Perspectives: CSS exams require a comprehensive understanding of various perspectives. Summaries expose you to a range of viewpoints on critical issues, helping you broaden your intellectual horizons. 📝 Quick Updates on Current Affairs: Summarized editorials provide quick updates on the latest happenings, enabling you to stay informed about recent developments without delving into lengthy articles. 📝 Constructing Coherent Arguments: The concise nature of summaries teaches you how to articulate complex ideas succinctly. This skill is invaluable when constructing well-structured and concise answers in the CSS exam. 📝 Enhancing Writing Skills: Analyzing succinct summaries equips you with the ability to distill your thoughts into concise, coherent sentences — a skill that directly translates into writing impactful essays and answers. 📝 Practical Application in Interviews: Summarized opinions give you a bank of well-articulated arguments that you can draw upon during interviews. This helps you participate actively in discussions, demonstrating your depth of knowledge. 📝 Retaining Key Concepts: Summarizing editorials involves identifying the core concepts. This process reinforces your memory and understanding of crucial topics, ensuring they stay embedded in your long-term memory. 📝 Stimulating Critical Thinking: When you engage with summarized editorials, you’re encouraged to think critically about the main points and arguments. This practice nurtures your ability to question assumptions and delve deeper into subjects. 📝 Adaptable Learning: Summaries allow you to adapt your learning approach based on your time and goals. Whether you’re seeking a quick update or an in-depth analysis, summaries can cater to your needs. To receive the summaries, solutions, and vocabulary meanings directly on WhatsApp, click the link below and join “Dawn Important Editorials” now: 🔗 https://cssmcqs.com/dawn-editorials-articles-summary-for-students-pdf-download/ 📝 Register on our website [https://cssmcqs.com/register/] for more exclusive benefits and resources. 📢 Stay informed, be prepared, and excel in your knowledge-building journey with CSSMCQs.com! 📢 🔔 Join our WhatsApp group and seize the opportunity for valuable insights! 🔔 Looking forward to having you as part of our vibrant community! Best regards, CSS MCQs dawn.com The privatisation agenda Miftah Ismail 6–8 minutes THE caretaker government and the Privatisation Minister Fawad Hasan Fawad are trying to privatise some state-owned enterprises, particularly PIA. Mr Fawad, possibly the most competent bureaucrat of his generation, was persecuted by one side and felt abandoned by the other, in the ever-changing sides that is our politics. Those opposed to the privatisation of PIA are casting aspersions that the privatisation minister and the caretaker government have some hidden agenda with regard to PIA’s privatisation. What agenda can they have? Let’s review some numbers. There are five airlines in Pakistan, four of them private. All charge about the same fare and provide the same level of service. Yet the four private airlines earn money and pay taxes. PIA, on the other hand, lost Rs88 billion last year on sales of Rs172bn. That’s a 51 per cent loss on sales, a proportion of loss that’s difficult to accomplish even if one tries very hard. The year before PIA lost Rs50bn. And the year before Rs35bn. The accumulated losses of PIA to date are Rs717bn, with a present value of over Rs900bn. That amount, Rs900bn, is enough to build 15 Aga Khan University Hospitals, enough to build 60 Lums universities, or enough to build 18,000 schools across Pakistan. The Pakistani taxpayer would be much better off with privatisation of the airline. Instead, we have elected to continue with a loss-making enterprise that gives jobs to but 8,000 employees, never pays civil aviation dues and reluctantly pays PSO for its fuel. PIA has lost money under all governments and boards and after every single revival scheme conjured up by the airline and financed by a governmental grant. In the last 15 years, the government has put Rs109bn directly into PIA and guaranteed banks loans of Rs263bn. We can inject as much money in PIA as we want, but the simple truth is that PIA is beyond repair. The Pakistani taxpayer would be much better off with privatisation of the airline quickly while ensuring job security of the employees. Privatisation brings me to consider also our railway monopoly, the Pakistan Railways. Last year, the government gave Rs45bn to cover its operational losses plus an additional Rs25bn for development expenditures for a total of Rs70bn. The year before PR got Rs59bn and the year before Rs56bn. In the last 15 years alone, taxpayers have subsidised PR by Rs783bn with a present value of around Rs1,000bn. The cost of diesel to move a kilogram of cargo is three to four times more for trucks than it is for trains. And yet PR charges more for cargo than trucks do. Trains are a more comfortable and safer way for passenger travel, yet a vast majority of travelling Pakistanis prefer long-distance bus travel over railways. However, rather than improving services or reducing losses, the railway bureaucracy wants the government to borrow another $7bn for new tracks and increase the quantum of losses and subsidies taxpayers will have to bear for decades. Where is self-reflection in the railways ministry? Where is the will to reform? Why isn’t PR able to compete with road transport when its fuel cost is only a fraction of the latter? Can you imagine the inefficiency and possibly graft that must be part of PIA and PR that, in spite of years of government subsidies, they keep losing billions and repeatedly ask us to bail them out? Our railway ministry, by running PR, works for railway interests and not for consumers or taxpayers. However, instead of operating PR, its role should be redefined as a regulator for the industry. We should privatise both tracks and trains to multiple operators, and the ministry, working as a regulator, should set and enforce safety standards for tracks and trains, and set maximum charges track owners can charge trains and trains can charge for freight and passengers. And if there are efficiency and safety improvements required by the regulating ministry in tracks and trains, the private sector should do so with its own funds — to be compensated through fares — as a licensing requirement to own tracks and run trains. Finally, the katchi abadis that have sprung up on PR lands should be regularised with ownership given to the poor occupants and the remaining land can be sold to ensure salaries and benefits for existing railway employees until retirement. Let’s now consider Pakistan Steel Mills, which has been shut for eight years, with the employees still being paid. PSM owes over Rs100bn to National Bank and Sui Southern. A reasonable way to compensate for the debt, while not critically jeopardising the financial health of Sui Southern and NBP, would be to hand over PSM’s remaining land to them. (PSM started with 20,000 acres, with 5,000 acres for the mill, and the remaining for downstream industries. After encroachment on about 2,000 acres, an industrial park of 1,500 acres, and an employees’ housing society, there remains only about 8,000 acres). This land can then be sold by Sui Southern and NBP to partially recover their dues. The steel mill itself, Russian-made of 1960s vintage, can still be revived either by selling or leasing it. However, the existing employees should continue to be paid till they retire. There is no better place for the caretaker government and SIFC to reform the economy and improve our business climate than by privatising these three entities. Whereas privatisation of PIA and PSM will just stop the losses, the privatisation of PR will not just stem the losses but can also be a great impetus in the overall improvement of the economy. New money poured into these SOEs will be a waste, as we have seen repeatedly. We need private-sector investors, and well-regulated markets, for SOEs to become profitable and finally be beneficial to consumers and taxpayers. The privatisation agenda is to stem the losses and improve the economy. The baseless aspersions on ministers are just a way to derail the process. The writer is a former finance minister. Published in Dawn, December 7th, 2023