Pakistan’s foreign policy is anchored in its strategic ties with China, which are vital. However, Pakistan also seeks amicable relations with Washington, and concerns persist about the US-China rivalry potentially limiting Pakistan’s associations with either nation. The recent Biden-Xi meeting at the APEC summit may alleviate some apprehensions, as the US seems more focused on curbing China’s military and technological advancements than its economic growth. Global geopolitics is witnessing a broader competition, with many countries aligning with both the US and China to maximize their global engagement. Despite these opportunities, Pakistan lacks the strategy and capacity to benefit fully. Public sentiments toward China are generally positive, while reservations persist against the US. Pakistan acknowledges the risks of overdependence on China and recognizes the necessity of a working relationship with the US, a crucial export destination, foreign investor, and stakeholder in South Asian stability. However, public reservations against the US persist due to historical complexities, including perceived elitist support, political interference, and repercussions of wars that fueled instability and extremism in Pakistan. Despite the challenges, Pakistan needs to navigate its relationships with both China and the US to optimize its global engagement effectively.
The article discusses Pakistan’s foreign policy dynamics, emphasizing its strategic ties with China and the desire for amicable relations with the US. Recent developments, such as the Biden-Xi meeting, may ease concerns about the US-China rivalry impacting Pakistan’s associations. However, public sentiments toward the US remain complex due to historical challenges, hindering the country’s ability to fully benefit from opportunities presented by aligning with both global powers. The article underscores the need for Pakistan to navigate its relationships effectively to optimize its global engagement.
SOLUTIONS of The Problem:
Pakistan needs to reinvent its relevance to America’s South Asia policy by focusing on its economy and shared security interests, emphasizing its importance beyond historical ties.
Prioritize economic cooperation and mutual interests in dealings with the US, emphasizing the potential for economic collaboration as a driving force for bilateral relations.
Address public reservations against the US through effective public diplomacy, providing a nuanced understanding of historical complexities while highlighting the benefits of a pragmatic relationship.
Actively diversify global engagements beyond China and the US, exploring partnerships with other nations to reduce dependence and maximize opportunities.
Align with the evolving global geopolitical landscape, positioning Pakistan strategically to contribute to and benefit from emerging alliances and economic opportunities.
IMPORTANT Facts and Figures Given in the article:
- Pakistan’s strategic ties with China are foundational to its foreign policy.
- Concerns persist about the US-China rivalry potentially restricting Pakistan’s relations with either country.
- The Biden-Xi meeting at the APEC summit indicates a US focus on containing China’s military and technological ascent.
- Public sentiments in Pakistan often romanticize ties with China, while reservations against the US persist.
- The US is a significant export destination, foreign investor, IMF-dependent economic supporter, and key stakeholder in South Asian stability for Pakistan.
- Historical complexities, wars, and perceived elitist support contribute to public reservations against the US in Pakistan.
MCQs from the Article:
- What is the keystone of Pakistan’s foreign policy? A. Ties with India B. Strategic ties with China C. Relations with the EU D. Cooperation with Russia
- What recent meeting is mentioned as potentially easing Pakistan’s concerns? A. NATO summit B. Biden-Xi meeting at APEC summit C. G20 summit D. SAARC summit
- What does the article suggest about public sentiments toward China in Pakistan? A. Negative sentiments B. Neutral sentiments C. Generally positive sentiments D. Unspecified sentiments
- Why does Pakistan consider a working relationship with the US necessary? A. Historical alliances B. Leading export destination C. Cultural ties D. Geopolitical alignment
- What is emphasized as the focus for Pakistan to reinvent its relevance to America’s South Asia policy? A. Military alliances B. Economy and shared security interests C. Cultural exchanges D. Technological collaboration
- Keystone (noun) (کلیدی چیز): The central or most important part of something.
- Amicable (adjective) (دوستانہ): Characterized by friendliness and goodwill.
- Apprehensions (noun) (دھڑکن): Anxiety or fear that something bad or unpleasant will happen.
- Optimize (verb) (بہتر بنانا): Make the best or most effective use of (a situation, opportunity, or resource).
- Nuanced (adjective) (تفصیلی): Characterized by
subtle shades of meaning or expression.
- Pragmatic (adjective) (عملی): Dealing with things sensibly and realistically in a way that is based on practical rather than theoretical considerations.
- Diversification (noun) (تنوع): The action of making or becoming more diverse or varied.
- Romanticize (verb) (رومانی کرنا): Deal with or describe in an idealized or unrealistic fashion; make (something) seem better or more appealing than it really is.
- Elitist (adjective) (اعلی طبقے کا): Relating to or supporting the view that a society or system should be led by an elite.
- Ambiguous (adjective) (مبہم): Open to more than one interpretation; having a double meaning.
📢 Attention Readers! We are deeply concerned about individuals who share our summaries without providing proper credit. We kindly request that you refrain from removing the attribution label affixed to this article. Considerable time, effort, resources, and expertise have been invested in its creation. It is essential to exhibit professionalism by crediting the source appropriately and acknowledging the rightful contributions. Your cooperation in sharing the original article is greatly appreciated. Failure to comply with this request may lead to legal consequences. We maintain a dedicated team of advocates ready to address instances of unprofessional and unethical behaviour, including copyright infringement. 🔥 Get Concise Editorial Summaries, Solutions, and Vocabulary Meanings! 🔥 🔵 Prepared by the Expert Team at CSSMCQs.com! 🔵 👉 Looking for a hassle-free way to stay informed about current affairs and editorial insights? We’ve got you covered! 💡 ✨ Introducing “Dawn Important Editorials“! ✨ 📚 Join our WhatsApp Channel for quick and comprehensive summaries of the latest editorials, along with well-crafted solutions and helpful vocabulary meanings. 📚 🔍 Why Choose Us? 🔍 👉 Our team at CSSMCQs.com uses their efforts to bring you accurate and efficient summaries. 👉 Stay updated with the most important points from the editorials, saving you time and effort. 👉 Benefit from our expertly crafted solutions that offer insightful perspectives and creative ideas. 👉 Expand your vocabulary with our thorough explanations and translations. 👉 All this is at your fingertips, available in one convenient WhatsApp group! 🌟 Why Reading Summaries are so necessary for CSS & PMS Aspirants? 📝 Cultivating Critical Analysis: Summaries of editorials and opinions distill the essence of complex arguments, enhancing your ability to dissect intricate ideas, extract core arguments, and recognize underlying themes. 📝 Efficient Time Management: CSS aspirants often juggle multiple subjects and topics. Reading summarized editorials and opinions allows you to grasp diverse viewpoints in a fraction of the time. 📝 Diverse Perspectives: CSS exams require a comprehensive understanding of various perspectives. Summaries expose you to a range of viewpoints on critical issues, helping you broaden your intellectual horizons. 📝 Quick Updates on Current Affairs: Summarized editorials provide quick updates on the latest happenings, enabling you to stay informed about recent developments without delving into lengthy articles. 📝 Constructing Coherent Arguments: The concise nature of summaries teaches you how to articulate complex ideas succinctly. This skill is invaluable when constructing well-structured and concise answers in the CSS exam. 📝 Enhancing Writing Skills: Analyzing succinct summaries equips you with the ability to distill your thoughts into concise, coherent sentences — a skill that directly translates into writing impactful essays and answers. 📝 Practical Application in Interviews: Summarized opinions give you a bank of well-articulated arguments that you can draw upon during interviews. This helps you participate actively in discussions, demonstrating your depth of knowledge. 📝 Retaining Key Concepts: Summarizing editorials involves identifying the core concepts. This process reinforces your memory and understanding of crucial topics, ensuring they stay embedded in your long-term memory. 📝 Stimulating Critical Thinking: When you engage with summarized editorials, you’re encouraged to think critically about the main points and arguments. This practice nurtures your ability to question assumptions and delve deeper into subjects. 📝 Adaptable Learning: Summaries allow you to adapt your learning approach based on your time and goals. Whether you’re seeking a quick update or an in-depth analysis, summaries can cater to your needs. To receive the summaries, solutions, and vocabulary meanings directly on WhatsApp, click the link below and join “Dawn Important Editorials” now: 🔗 https://cssmcqs.com/dawn-editorials-articles-summary-for-students-pdf-download/ 📝 Register on our website [https://cssmcqs.com/register/] for more exclusive benefits and resources. 📢 Stay informed, be prepared, and excel in your knowledge-building journey with CSSMCQs.com! 📢 🔔 Join our WhatsApp group and seize the opportunity for valuable insights! 🔔 Looking forward to having you as part of our vibrant community! Best regards, CSS MCQs dawn.com US & South Asia Touqir Hussain 5–6 minutes PAKISTAN’S strategic ties with China are the keystone of its foreign policy. But it also wants friendly ties with Washington and has been concerned that the US-China rivalry could restrict its relationship with either country. The encouraging outcome of the Biden-Xi meeting on the sidelines of the recent APEC summit in San Francisco may ease some of Pakistan’s concerns. Washington appears focused on containing China’s military and technological ascent more than its economic rise, which is beneficial to the US and the global economy, and may be open to healthy economic competition with Beijing. Geopolitics, too, is opening to a wider contest. As the US and China compete to reorder the world according to their respective visions, many countries are aligning with both to maximise their global engagement and optimise their interests, so as to be comfortable with any future international order. BRICS is just one example of this ‘multi-vector’ foreign policy. But Pakistan lacks the strategy and capacity to benefit from the opportunities. Its ties with China and the US evoke conflicting public emotions: a romanticised image of ties with China versus an adverse view of the US. Yet officials are conscious of the risk of Pakistan becoming overly dependent on China, and feel the country must have a working relationship with the US, its leading export destination, a major foreign investor, a lifeline to its IMF-dependent economy, and a key stakeholder in South Asian stability. Rivalries and geopolitics have become more complex. But public reservations against the US remain. It is true the benefits of ties with the US have come at a heavy cost. By supporting the elitist-led, security-dominated, ideologically rooted, and externally dependent outlook on the country, the US hindered Pakistan’s political process. Its wars fomented instability and extremism in Pakistan. But the public must understand that Pakistan’s leadership that partnered with Washington was equally invested in US policies and should share the blame. There are other misperceptions. For decades, Pakistan’s leaders, strategic community and public believed in the centrality of Pakistan-US ties to US policies in South Asia, largely because of the high-profile aid relationship. They are now disappointed the US has abandoned an ally and ‘switched’ to India. In fact, substantial US aid was not equivalent to a substantive relationship. And the alliance commitment was ambiguous and narrowly focused. Nor did the US have a South Asia policy. But it found Pakistan’s services valuable in meeting specific and sporadic geopolitical and security challenges from time to time. That is why it found no contradiction between relations with Pakistan and its support to non-aligned India following the 1962 Sino-India war. It was not until the rise of China, the onset of globalisation, the advent of information technology, and emergence of religious extremism that America started seeing certain lasting strategic, economic, and security interests in South Asia. Through its relationship with India, it hoped to contain Chinese influence in the region and beyond, and sought Pakistan’s cooperation in meeting security threats. Since then, Great Power rivalry, geopolitics, and regional politics have become more complex, with the assault on globalisation by trade wars, Covid-19, supply chain issues, and national security concerns. After a failed attempt by the US to de-globalise, efforts at re-globalisation, as qualified by geopolitics, are now afoot. They are marked on the one hand by China’s expanding economic footprint, which has spurred the US to enhance its global economic influence, and on the other, by the attempts of rising middle powers to create a multipolar world across geopolitical barriers. This has blurred the distinction between geo-economics and geopolitics. And rising India finds itself at a crossroads. Its geostrategic position on the Indian Ocean and border dispute with China make it America’s natural geopolitical partner, while its technological and economic potential make it an attractive partner in geo-economics. The US wants to accelerate AI development and feels India can help meet its shortage of “scientists, technologists and engineers”. America’s ties with India and Pakistan are thus not comparable. Pakistan has not lost its value for Washington but its ties of the past won’t be its future. The country will have to reinvent its relevance to America’s South Asia policy by focusing on its economy and shared security interests. Geopolitics though relevant will not drive the relationship. Bottom line: Ties with the US are not perfect but are still necessary. Ties with China are indispensable but not sufficient for Pakistan’s needs. The writer, a former ambassador, is adjunct professor Georgetown University and Visiting Senior Research Fellow, National University of Singapore. Published in Dawn, November 30th, 2023